This past weekend I returned to Wisconsin for the Kettle 100
to run as part of a relay team. If you hear “relay” and think of people running
part of a lap around a track and handing off a baton, this being repeated until
all four runners on the team are finished, you’re sort of close, except in this
case the track isn’t an oval; it’s two out-and-backs. Oh, and the “track” is
actually in the woods, up and down hills and over meadows. And it’s a hundred
miles long. Other than that, pretty close.
There were four teams from my trail running group, one all
male, one all female under 40, one female masters team, and one mixed. I was on
the mixed team; I technically qualified for a female masters team but I wanted
to be with a group that just wanted to have fun and didn’t care how long it
took to finish. The female masters team also said they just wanted to have fun,
but “fun” is a deceptive word. It implies that you care more for the experience
than the outcome, but let’s be honest: for any activity that involves
athleticism, be it playing a ballgame or running a race, it’s almost certainly
going to be more fun if you do it well. And when it comes to running, the four
women on the masters team do very, very well.
How well? Of the two women doing the 31-mile legs, one was
fairly new to trail ultra running and the other was battling an injury; of the
two doing the 19-mile leg, both had struggled with recent injuries as well. And
despite this—despite the fact that one of the four was clearly not simply
recovering from her injury but right in the middle of it and ran over
an hour slower than last year—the group still managed to set a new course
record for masters female teams by forty
minutes. That is doing it well, to say the least, and the happy smiles and
excited discussions they had after the race was over confirmed that they also
had a hell of a lot of fun out there.
The women in the female masters team are all in their 40s,
divorced, three with children, all incredibly fit and strong and independent.
They’ve all run crazy numbers of races crazily fast, they’ve all qualified for
the Boston Marathon, they’ve all been hugely successful in their running. At
this point it would be too easy to turn this into a piece filled with gushy-but-gungho
praise for their toughness, their awesomeness, their sheer badassery. The
praise would be deserved—and purposeful; after all, it wasn’t that long ago
(certainly within my lifetime) that it would be unheard of to know even one
woman who was single, in her 40s and ran ultramarathons, much less for most of
your female friends in that age group to fit that description. But since you
read this blog, you know that nothing I ruminate about here is ever going to be
a recitation of inspirational platitudes—even though there are times that seems
desirable. One of those times was Saturday night, when the last of the female
master runners came sprinting to the finish line and the four ladies received
their first-place plaque from the race director and then excitedly huddled
together to exchange stories about their experiences.
One of the women in the under-40 team, Staci-Ann (whom I
wrote about two years ago in my post about Kettle), was talking to some of the others
about the winners of the overall 100-mile race, who actually beat all of our teams’ finish times running solo (get your head around that if you can). We sputtered our awe
at these elite runners, and the masters women, overhearing our discussion,
added their admiration as well.
“You are all elite
as far as I’m concerned!” Staci-Ann exclaimed to the four. “I mean, you all did
Boston!”
Hearing Staci-Ann gush about their Boston status is a little
like hearing a Pulitzer Prize winner gush about a Nobel laureate. Staci-Ann is
uniformly admired by all her running peers for being a consistently solid
runner, someone who can just keep going until she’s finished the distance she
set out to do, whatever that distance may be. If you told her this, though, she’d
insist that you are the one who’s the
solid runner, you are the superstar,
even if you aren’t. I can’t tell you how angry this makes me. I know how that
sounds—for goodness sake, she’s praising
you, and you gotta be a mean nasty bitch about it? Well, yeah, I do.
I have always wished I could maintain an attitude like hers
or like many of the other people I know who aren’t bothered by nagging
insecurities and petty envy. But I can’t lie to myself: I am in fact very insecure
and I can be quite petty. Watching the female masters four, I wondered,
wistfully, what it would be like to be able to run at that level, to be able to
sit there in the “elite” circle and talk about their experiences knowing that
they’d just accomplished something pretty damned amazing. Yeah, I know, running
double-digit mileage on tough terrain is pretty damned amazing for anyone at
any age, I know, I know, I know. But
let’s be honest: there’s doing a tough thing at all, and there’s doing a tough
thing incredibly well, and there is a
difference. This doesn’t mean that the former is a pointless endeavor; it just
means that there are some experiences I’ll probably never have no matter how
badly I want them or try to get them. And because I’m curious about other
experiences, I’ll always wonder what it will be like.
This, I realize, is not a bad thing. The world would be a
small and boring place for me if all I cared about was my own
self-satisfaction. I’m never going to be a jockey or a horse, but I can still
be enthralled when one pretty pony gets the Triple Crown. Likewise I am never
going to do the Rice Lake leg in three hours and change or the Scuppernong leg
in less than six, even though two each of my female running buddies, who are
all within a few years of my age, were able to do just that. It’s a little more
complicated in this case, of course, since I’ve ridden a horse maybe twice in
my life and may never do so again in my lifetime, but I am right now a masters female who runs long distances—just a whole
lot slower than my buddies.
Thing is, there is the experience of struggling through
something difficult, and there is the experience of seeing someone else
struggle through the same something difficult a whole lot faster, and each
experience will engender its own mix of emotions, from frustration and relief
to awe and envy. Why deny myself any of that? Why pick and choose only those feelings
that are simple and easy to handle? I want it all, baby, and if being on earth
four-plus decades has taught me anything (anything that I’ve managed to
retain), it’s that you can have it
all so long as you remember that “all” means just that, everything. You can
believe you’re amazing and you can believe you suck. You can believe in
happily-ever-after and you can discover that maybe you don’t want your
ever-after to be so dependent on someone else. You can create yourself as a
certain person, you can question the creation, and then you can alter the
creation completely. You can love the run and you can hate the run. All things
are possible even if some of them aren’t always desirable, but hey, you’ve been
around a while, you can deal with it.
No comments:
Post a Comment