I love baseball, but don’t worry: this is not going to be
one of those essays that waxes dreamily and poetically about the beauty of the game.
Like most human endeavors, and pretty much all human endeavors where there are
winners and losers, baseball frequently gets downright ugly. Without even
getting into the drugs, the money, the egos, the immaturity, the
corruption, and all the other nastiness of the game itself, there’s so much
ugliness to be witnessed in the fans themselves that we barely even need the
all that other crap. Now that we’re into the post-season, I made the mistake of
sneering at fair-weather Cubs fans who are suddenly all about how “their” team
is going to prove Back to the Future
right this year and finally, finally prevail. I wondered aloud (or e-loud, at
least) how many of them have actually even watched
a game in the regular season—or even know how many regular season games there
are, or how many innings there are,
or the fact that a ballgame is divided into innings and not quarters or dimes
or something else? In short, I became an ugly cliché: the die-hard fan who
thinks no other fan could possibly live up to their own level of fandom.
The funny thing is, I quickly recognized that I myself could
easily be accused of being a fair-weather fan, or at least a finicky fan who
doesn’t know the meaning of loyalty. First off, I was born and raised in
Hawaii, which has no pro sports. There was once a minor league team, the Islanders
(and telling you that I went to a couple of their games when I was a kid is
seriously dating me), but eventually it got too expensive to schlep the team
around and have other teams schlepped to Honolulu (as much as those teams might
have wanted such schlepping), so bye-bye Islanders. In short, I was not a
baseball fan of any team at all until I left home. Football was my game, since
my father was a big 49ers fan, and luckily we got to follow the team during the
Montana/Walsh years. You can’t really be accused of fair-weatherness when you
live in Hawaii and you happen to root for a damn good team. What other kind of
weather is there?
When I went to college, I started following the San
Francisco Giants. A football fan needs something to do the rest of the year,
after all. The first year I followed them, they lost a hundred games, which
certainly disqualifies me from fair-weather status (especially because that was
back in the Candlestick Park days and if you’d ever been to Candlestick Park,
you know that even in July, there are Arctic winds and dense fog, and the
bleacher bums frequently have to be treated for hypothermia). Eventually a few
seasons later they made it to the World Series … which was promptly hit by an earthquake,
and they ended up losing four in a row to the A’s. Maybe this is
rationalization, but it was kind of hard to care about the series after seeing
freeways collapse and a section of bridge fall into the bay.
When I moved to New York, it became impossible for me to
follow the Giants the way I used to, which was to watch or listen to every
single game from pregame to post, so I stopped watching baseball for a few years.
If I couldn’t watch my team, well,
what was the point? And then there was a boy. The boy was a Mets fan, so I became
one too. Unfortunately New York back then was all about the Yankees, whose
unfathomably deep pockets meant they could buy a winning team and attract
legions of equally deep-pocketed Manhattanites who wouldn’t be caught dead on a
subway headed to another borough much less actually in the Bronx but still
somehow managed to claim die-hard fan status. The Mets were “the other team,”
whose fans claimed to be the tough, blue-collar, salt-of-the-earth counterpart
to the Evil Robber-Baron Skankees. Even at the time I thought that was baloney,
but the boy believed it, his own family from Queens, his ancestors Irish
miners, his accent thoroughly Long Island (big things weren’t just big, they
were “yuge”)—so I went along with it. The Mets weren’t any good, but the boy
seemed to like that, as it allowed him a martyr’s long-suffering dignity.
Of course, Mets martyrdom pales in comparison to the Cubs. Here
in east-central Illinois I’ve had my choice of teams to root for, and I could
have ended up deciding to follow either of the two Chicago teams, the hard-luck
Cubbies or the … who are the other guys again? (You want to talk long-suffering,
talk to someone from South Chicago who loves a team nobody else even remembers
much less cares about.) As it turned out, though, there was another boy, this
one from St. Louis. And as it further turned out, the team this boy followed was
damned good, year after year, present year included. This could easily earn me
bandwagon-fan status, particularly from those who have been loyal to one
particular team since birth, their first baby bibs emblazoned with the team
logo, their first outfits in team colors. I’ve visited St. Louis a couple of
times and enjoyed it very much—what’s not to like about a place where the zoo
is free and the ravioli fried?—but I have no other direct connection to it, and
even the BF hasn’t lived there in many decades. Why then do I care? What kind
of “fan” am I, really, and what gives me the right to judge any other fan’s
motives?
Obviously the only right I have to judge anyone else is the self-assumed
right that comes from being a human being with strong opinions about ridiculous
subjects. Of course there is no “best” way to be a fan—or to not be one, for
those who would dismiss the whole baseball thing as absurd. It is absurd. It’s a game played by men who
act like children and get paid a lot of money to do so. These men are
professionals who have no real loyalty to the city in which they play, and in
fact they may end up playing for an entirely different city next season—maybe
even their current “enemies.” When I choose to root for a team, I’m not rooting
for the men that make up that team or even for the city where they play, since I’ve
lived in a lot of cities and I’ve found something to like (and dislike) in all
of them. I guess I’m sort of rooting for baseball as a general concept, but not
entirely, since I don’t quite buy into all that Field of Dreams mysticism, no matter how convincingly declared by James
Earl Jones, about how baseball will save our souls. It won’t. Like so much in
life, baseball is something I decided to care about, knowing its flaws, knowing
that I certainly didn’t have to care
about this but deciding I would anyway and then caring about it deeply,
learning all I could, embracing what’s beautiful in it yet not blinding myself
to what’s ugly (as well as what is, let’s be honest, frequently very boring).
You can do that in life, if you’re lucky; you can pick things and choose to
make them matter to you.
And despite the fact that any given team’s fans will tell
you that some other team’s fans are the rudest, the stupidest, the ugliest, the
worst, despite the fact that so many people believe, as I briefly made the
mistake of believing, that their own type of fandom is the only true fandom, in
my experience all baseball fans are pretty much the same. They’re looking for
something they can care about that’s outside themselves but still connected to
their lives. It isn’t deeply connected—no one really lives or dies by their team—but it’s something that they can
decide, however arbitrarily, matters to them. That’s a good thing. Can you
imagine a world where we don’t find
things that matter to us? Even if they’re silly, faulty, or deeply problematic,
better to care about things, and enjoy caring about them, even occasionally
suffer caring about them, than not.
Play ball.
I wouldn't consider you a bandwagon fan since you grew up in Hawaii and have lived various places. Different backgrounds affect fan choices. I grew up in Iowa and followed the Cubs via WGN, but I like other teams like the Twins, Royals, and Pirates and can root for teams that have interesting rosters like the Blue Jays.
ReplyDeleteAs a dude who plays fantasy baseball, I get to root for "my team" as a rotowhore.
However, I don't like the Cardinals. I respect the organization's tradition and great players from the past, but I grew tired of self-proclaimed "best fans in baseball" pretty quickly when I lived in St. Louis from '02-'07.
There was an interesting article in the WSJ today about how many comedians follow the Mets in comparison to the Yankees. Check it out.
I don't buy that any fans are the "best" or "worst." I've visited almost all of the major league ballparks and have had similar experiences in all of them -- mostly nice fans, a few jerks, but nothing too terrible. I suppose my experience might be different if I lived in a place (my sister lives in Seattle and she loathes Seahawks and Mariners fans). Luckily, C-U has a wide mix of fans, which makes it interesting.
DeleteI'll have to check out that article. Mets fans have an interesting psychology compared to the Skanks.